Genuine Fractals vs. Interpolation

As an example I have taken a photograph from my Gallery. This shot of my God-daughter was taken on my Olympus C-2500 at a resolution of 1768 x 1368 pixels.

Using Genuine Fractals I have blown up the image to 10" x 8 " at 360 d.p.i., ideal for printing on my Epson 750. I have also used the Bicubic resample filter in Paint Shop Pro to interpolate another copy of the image to the same size. To save you download time I've simply selected a small section of each image around the mouth. This section shows the differences between the techniques quite well.
 

Bicubic Interpolation


 

Genuine Fractals

As you can see the difference is small but noticeable. It may not be as visible on your screen as when printed, so to demonstrate better, I've zoomed in to both these images:-
 
 
Interpolation
Fractal compression

As you can see the close-up on the right is noticeably sharper, but interestingly it does not accentuate the camera's JPEG artefacts as much as the interpolated image. It does however make the gap between the teeth look slightly larger, which could be considered a fault. For reference, this is the original image magnified to approximately the same size:-

Back to Review More comparisons